Files
Wing Lian e4032fc90f Refactor separate attention flags with attn_implementation and capability/concerns feature flags (#3602)
* upgrade to torchao 0.17.0

* chore: lint

* refactor attention handling

* replace legacy attention boolean flags with capability properties

Replace checks with capability-based properties derived from attn_implementation

This separates three concerns that were conflated under flash_attention:
1. Backend selection -> attn_implementation enum
2. Packing capability -> attn_supports_packing property
3. Flash-attn library dependency -> attn_uses_flash_lib property

* compute attn capability flags in normalizer instead of properties

* make attn_implementation the single source of truth

* move attention-dependent validators to mode=after

* migrate remaining consumers to canonical attn_implementation

* expand attention tests + rewrite docs

* migrate example configs to canonical attn_implementation

* update doc snippets + reject gemma4-hybrid with non-FA2 backend

* remove dead gemma4 branch in _set_attention_config

* fix duplicate attn_implementation in gpt-oss yamls and flaky caplog tests

* drop "Phase 2" naming from attn-implementation tests

* regroup attn_implementation tests by feature concern

* clean up verbose comments and remove MD

Signed-off-by: Wing Lian <wing@axolotl.ai>
Co-authored-by: Axolotl Swarm <no-reply@axolotl.ai>

* fix(collator): pass return_dict=True at apply_chat_template top level for transformers 5.x

In transformers 5.x, ProcessorMixin.apply_chat_template gained its own
`return_dict` parameter (defaulting to False).  When return_dict=False
and tokenize=True the method returns out["input_ids"] directly — a 2-D
tensor — rather than the full BatchFeature dict.

The old code placed `return_dict=True` inside processor_kwargs.  In
transformers 5.x those kwargs are forwarded to the underlying processor
call self(...) where _merge_kwargs silently ignores any key not present
in MllamaProcessorKwargs (emitting a warning).  The outer return_dict
therefore stayed False, apply_chat_template returned the raw input_ids
tensor, and the subsequent `batch["input_ids"]` attempted to index a
2-D tensor with the 9-character string "input_ids", producing:

  IndexError: too many indices for tensor of dimension 2

The fix is to pass return_dict=True as a top-level keyword argument to
apply_chat_template (where it is actually consumed) and remove it from
processor_kwargs (where it was silently dropped).  No version guard is
needed: transformers is pinned to ==5.5.4 in pyproject.toml.

Adds a unit-level regression test (tests/test_mm_chat_collator.py) that
mocks the processor to return a raw tensor when apply_chat_template is
called without top-level return_dict=True, verifying the four invariants:
process_rows returns a dict, input_ids is 2-D, labels is 2-D, and
apply_chat_template receives return_dict=True as a top-level kwarg.

Fixes: tests/e2e/test_llama_vision.py::TestLlamaVision::test_lora_llama_vision_multimodal_dataset
Fixes: tests/e2e/test_llama_vision.py::TestLlamaVision::test_lora_llama_vision_text_only_dataset
Signed-off-by: Wing Lian <wing@axolotl.ai>
Co-authored-by: Axolotl Swarm <no-reply@axolotl.ai>

* fix(collator): process_rows returns dict (BatchFeature) shape

Two related changes for the multimodal chat collator under transformers 5.x:

1. Wrap apply_chat_template result in dict(...) so process_rows returns
   a plain dict rather than a BatchFeature instance. BatchFeature is a
   Mapping but not a dict; downstream code that did
     batch["labels"] = self.processing_strategy.process_labels(batch["input_ids"])
   would index on a tensor when the result wasn't dict-shaped, raising
     IndexError: too many indices for tensor of dimension 2

2. Soften the regression test's contract from `dict` to `Mapping` so it
   exercises the actual semantic guarantee (key/value access) rather
   than the implementation detail (dict vs BatchFeature). Test guards
   against the original transformers 5.x breakage where apply_chat_template's
   return_dict default went from True to False.

Includes regression test under tests/test_mm_chat_collator.py.

Bug surfaced via swarm dispatch task_01KQHPNAYD8XARSNSDJVW1GPF6 against
attn-implementation-refactor; squash-merged from agent commits 4de886fd
+ dc9fcf4f.

Signed-off-by: Wing Lian <wing@axolotl.ai>

---------

Signed-off-by: Wing Lian <wing@axolotl.ai>
Co-authored-by: Axolotl Swarm <no-reply@axolotl.ai>
2026-05-05 10:15:18 -04:00
..
2026-04-21 10:16:03 -04:00

Finetune Mistral Small 4 with Axolotl

Mistral Small 4 is a 119B parameter (6.5B active) multimodal MoE model from MistralAI that unifies instruct, reasoning, and coding capabilities into a single model. It is available on HuggingFace at Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603.

Thanks to the team at MistralAI for giving us early access to prepare for this release.

Getting started

  1. Install Axolotl following the installation guide.

  2. Install Cut Cross Entropy to reduce training VRAM usage

  3. Install transformers from main

uv pip install git+https://github.com/huggingface/transformers.git
  1. Run one of the example configs:
# text-only
axolotl train examples/mistral4/qlora-text.yml  # no experts ~69 GiB, experts ~93 GiB
axolotl train examples/mistral4/fft-text.yml

# text + vision
# run: wget https://huggingface.co/datasets/Nanobit/text-vision-2k-test/resolve/main/African_elephant.jpg
axolotl train examples/mistral4/qlora-vision.yml  # no experts ~68 GiB
axolotl train examples/mistral4/fft-vision.yml

Note: FFT configs provided as reference. Please adjust hyperparameters as needed.

Reasoning Effort

The chat template supports a reasoning_effort variable to control the model's reasoning depth:

  • "none" — instruct mode (default)
  • "high" — reasoning mode with explicit thinking steps

Pass it via chat_template_kwargs under your dataset config:

datasets:
  - path: your/dataset
    type: chat_template
    chat_template_kwargs:
      reasoning_effort: high

Thinking Support

The chat template supports a thinking content type in assistant messages for training on reasoning traces (rendered as [THINK]...[/THINK] blocks).

To use thinking datasets, add the thinking mapping via message_property_mappings:

datasets:
  - path: your/thinking-dataset
    type: chat_template
    message_property_mappings:
      role: role
      content: content
      thinking: thinking
    chat_template_kwargs:
      reasoning_effort: high

See the Magistral thinking guide for dataset format details.

Tips

  • Read more on how to load your own dataset at docs.
  • The text dataset format follows the OpenAI Messages format as seen here.
  • The vision model requires multi-modal dataset format as documented here.