e4032fc90f
* upgrade to torchao 0.17.0 * chore: lint * refactor attention handling * replace legacy attention boolean flags with capability properties Replace checks with capability-based properties derived from attn_implementation This separates three concerns that were conflated under flash_attention: 1. Backend selection -> attn_implementation enum 2. Packing capability -> attn_supports_packing property 3. Flash-attn library dependency -> attn_uses_flash_lib property * compute attn capability flags in normalizer instead of properties * make attn_implementation the single source of truth * move attention-dependent validators to mode=after * migrate remaining consumers to canonical attn_implementation * expand attention tests + rewrite docs * migrate example configs to canonical attn_implementation * update doc snippets + reject gemma4-hybrid with non-FA2 backend * remove dead gemma4 branch in _set_attention_config * fix duplicate attn_implementation in gpt-oss yamls and flaky caplog tests * drop "Phase 2" naming from attn-implementation tests * regroup attn_implementation tests by feature concern * clean up verbose comments and remove MD Signed-off-by: Wing Lian <wing@axolotl.ai> Co-authored-by: Axolotl Swarm <no-reply@axolotl.ai> * fix(collator): pass return_dict=True at apply_chat_template top level for transformers 5.x In transformers 5.x, ProcessorMixin.apply_chat_template gained its own `return_dict` parameter (defaulting to False). When return_dict=False and tokenize=True the method returns out["input_ids"] directly — a 2-D tensor — rather than the full BatchFeature dict. The old code placed `return_dict=True` inside processor_kwargs. In transformers 5.x those kwargs are forwarded to the underlying processor call self(...) where _merge_kwargs silently ignores any key not present in MllamaProcessorKwargs (emitting a warning). The outer return_dict therefore stayed False, apply_chat_template returned the raw input_ids tensor, and the subsequent `batch["input_ids"]` attempted to index a 2-D tensor with the 9-character string "input_ids", producing: IndexError: too many indices for tensor of dimension 2 The fix is to pass return_dict=True as a top-level keyword argument to apply_chat_template (where it is actually consumed) and remove it from processor_kwargs (where it was silently dropped). No version guard is needed: transformers is pinned to ==5.5.4 in pyproject.toml. Adds a unit-level regression test (tests/test_mm_chat_collator.py) that mocks the processor to return a raw tensor when apply_chat_template is called without top-level return_dict=True, verifying the four invariants: process_rows returns a dict, input_ids is 2-D, labels is 2-D, and apply_chat_template receives return_dict=True as a top-level kwarg. Fixes: tests/e2e/test_llama_vision.py::TestLlamaVision::test_lora_llama_vision_multimodal_dataset Fixes: tests/e2e/test_llama_vision.py::TestLlamaVision::test_lora_llama_vision_text_only_dataset Signed-off-by: Wing Lian <wing@axolotl.ai> Co-authored-by: Axolotl Swarm <no-reply@axolotl.ai> * fix(collator): process_rows returns dict (BatchFeature) shape Two related changes for the multimodal chat collator under transformers 5.x: 1. Wrap apply_chat_template result in dict(...) so process_rows returns a plain dict rather than a BatchFeature instance. BatchFeature is a Mapping but not a dict; downstream code that did batch["labels"] = self.processing_strategy.process_labels(batch["input_ids"]) would index on a tensor when the result wasn't dict-shaped, raising IndexError: too many indices for tensor of dimension 2 2. Soften the regression test's contract from `dict` to `Mapping` so it exercises the actual semantic guarantee (key/value access) rather than the implementation detail (dict vs BatchFeature). Test guards against the original transformers 5.x breakage where apply_chat_template's return_dict default went from True to False. Includes regression test under tests/test_mm_chat_collator.py. Bug surfaced via swarm dispatch task_01KQHPNAYD8XARSNSDJVW1GPF6 against attn-implementation-refactor; squash-merged from agent commits 4de886fd + dc9fcf4f. Signed-off-by: Wing Lian <wing@axolotl.ai> --------- Signed-off-by: Wing Lian <wing@axolotl.ai> Co-authored-by: Axolotl Swarm <no-reply@axolotl.ai>
DBRX MoE
Currently, for LoRA, only the q_proj, k_proj, v_proj out_proj and layer Linear layers are trainable.
We are using the "converted" base models based on this issue
where the Experts are fused as an nn.Parameter rather than a nn.Linear layer. However, the implementation
is still a bit buggy and attempting to train a LoRA adapter over those w1, w2 and v1 layers
results in the trainer hanging.
FSDP
We've tested using the LnL-AI/dbrx-base-converted-v2 model as the base model for FSDP.
The high memory usage seen w/ FSDP is due to FSDP not supporting 8bit optimizers.
- 16-bit LoRA w/ FSDP
- ✅ w/o CPU Offload - 8x80GB uses ~80GiB/gpu
- ❌ w/ CPU Offload -
paged_adamw_8bitoptimizer errors from being on cpu
- ✅ 8-bit LoRA w/ FSDP
- ❌ 4-bit QLoRA w/ FSDP - errors w/:
Error an illegal memory access was encountered at line 90 in file /src/csrc/ops.cu - ✅ bf16 full finetune w/ FSDP, freezing all but first 8 layers (8x80GB uses ~78GiB/gpu)
Deepspeed
WIP